CARS Decision Making Technique Article Review - MGT 350: Critical Thinking (article review of a decision making technique, including applications and limitations)

CARS Decision Making Technique Article Re engage in While conducting internet inquiry on diverse critical cerebration and decision-making techniques that are available, I came across approximately material written by Robert Harris, a retired university English professor who now spends his time writing articles and essays on creative difficulty solving, using the Web as a research tool, avoiding plagiarization and other topics related to critical thinking and research. One article, Evaluating mesh Research Sources (Harris, 1997), introduced an innovative idea ab initio intended for research, alone it can in addition be use towards decision-making in the business. This method is called CARS, which stands for credibility, trueness, erudition and support. Credibility The first step in evaluation and decision-making is to determine the credibility of the source that is providing the material or issue. The listener or researcher should search for evidence of authenticity and r eliability as the material is provided. rough key tests that should be applied acknowledge checking the authors credibility or credentials, ensuring evidence of tone control for the material, looking for meta study (Harris, 1997), and check for indicators of miss of credibility. approximately indicators, in particular for written material, can include anonymity, lack of quality control, oppose metainformation and bad grammar or misspelled words. Accuracy The sustain step of evaluating research materials or analyzing input for decision-making is to conduct an accuracy test to assure that the information is actually correct (Harris, 1997). Some concepts that will help in the accuracy test include checking for timeliness, comprehensiveness, audience and purpose.

In addition, unitary should watch for indicators of lack of accuracy, which whitethorn include no exit on the document, vague or sweeping generalizations, old naming on information and a very one sided view that does not acknowledge argue views or respond to them (Harris, 1997). Reasonableness Checking for reasonableness includes examining the information... this essay is maledict broad(a). it has a lot of useful information, and goes to owing(p) lengths to explain the different sections of CARS. appeal introduction also. the essay was also arranged well, along with good sources at the bottom. If you want to tie a full essay, modulate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay